Comments on: Managing multiple Maven versions http://blog.organicelement.com/2009/11/02/managing-multiple-maven-versions/ Its only natural... Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:12:17 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Toni Menzel http://blog.organicelement.com/2009/11/02/managing-multiple-maven-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-851 Toni Menzel Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:04:18 +0000 http://blog.organicelement.com/?p=166#comment-851 Sure, if you want that, you'll need something like you did. Sure, if you want that, you’ll need something like you did.

]]> By: Chris Custine http://blog.organicelement.com/2009/11/02/managing-multiple-maven-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-850 Chris Custine Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:47:26 +0000 http://blog.organicelement.com/?p=166#comment-850 <blockquote cite="#commentbody-849"> <strong><a href="#comment-849" rel="nofollow">Toni Menzel</a> :</strong> <p>Nice.. but.. what exactly is not ok with using flat smybolic links ?<br> At least this works for me for all maven versions ( switch regularly with 2.0.10, 2.2.1 and 3-SNAPSHOT, works perfect)<br> cheers,<br> Toni</p> </blockquote> Mostly because I will regularly have multiple shells open, and need to use different Maven versions at the same time. This way I don't have any surprises. The symlink approach is fine but it means everything uses that version.

Toni Menzel :

Nice.. but.. what exactly is not ok with using flat smybolic links ?
At least this works for me for all maven versions ( switch regularly with 2.0.10, 2.2.1 and 3-SNAPSHOT, works perfect)
cheers,
Toni

Mostly because I will regularly have multiple shells open, and need to use different Maven versions at the same time. This way I don’t have any surprises. The symlink approach is fine but it means everything uses that version.

]]> By: Toni Menzel http://blog.organicelement.com/2009/11/02/managing-multiple-maven-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-849 Toni Menzel Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:39:13 +0000 http://blog.organicelement.com/?p=166#comment-849 Nice.. but.. what exactly is not ok with using flat smybolic links ? At least this works for me for all maven versions ( switch regularly with 2.0.10, 2.2.1 and 3-SNAPSHOT, works perfect) cheers, Toni Nice.. but.. what exactly is not ok with using flat smybolic links ?
At least this works for me for all maven versions ( switch regularly with 2.0.10, 2.2.1 and 3-SNAPSHOT, works perfect)
cheers,
Toni

]]>